Read it here now! ID’s MOST dangerous innovation
At Bounded Science: No Free Lunch for Intelligent Design, computer guy Tom English pinpoints what, to him is “The most dangerous innovation of ID creationism” (January 11, 2011),
So what is the most dangerous innovation of ID creationism? The movement stopped trying to overturn methodological naturalism, and adopted a new perspective on the nature of nature. The physical Universe is now comprised not just of matter and energy, but also of information. There is conservation of mass-energy, but not of information, which is created (only) by non-material intelligence. Six years ago, the design inference was to non-natural (i.e., supernatural) cause, and mainstream scientists were denigrated as naturalists. Now intelligent design is a non-material, though natural, cause, and mainstream scientists are denigrated as materialists.Oh, so now you must focus on the issues, Tom? Can Darwinism create information?
The change in ontology makes IDC much more slippery than it was in Kitzmiller. On a verbal level, IDC has stepped entirely within naturalism. It does not obviously appeal to supernatural explanations. Many physicists accept the notion that information is in some sense physical. Thus it is much harder today than it was six years ago to argue that IDC is not science and that teaching of IDC as science does not serve a secular purpose.
Better go back to “It’s all a plot,” I suppose.
English’s understanding seems to be all mixed up but never mind. He got half of one thing right; I keep missing which half.